---
title: "Editorial Policy – Independence, Corrections, Retest Rules"
canonical: "https://clothoff.co.uk/editorial-policy/"
alternate_html: "https://clothoff.co.uk/editorial-policy/"
lang: "en-GB"
publisher: "Clothoff UK Editorial Team (Organization)"
author: "Clothoff UK Editorial Team"
date_published: "2026-09-24"
date_modified: "2026-09-24"
page_type: "WebPage"
description: "How Clothoff UK stays independent: facts from official pages, editor-verified drafts, corrections in 10 business days, 90-day retests, no paid scores."
methodology: "https://clothoff.co.uk/how-we-review/"
editorial_policy: "https://clothoff.co.uk/editorial-policy/"
corrections_contact: "editorial@clothoff.co.uk"
ncii_report: "https://clothoff.co.uk/ncii-report/"
audience: "18+"
content_role: "publisher/review — the site operates no generator and processes no images"
license: "© Clothoff UK Editorial Team; quotation with source URL permitted"
version: "llm"
answer_first: "Editorial Policy, Version 24/09/2026. The rules the Clothoff UK Editorial Team follows for independence, sourcing, corrections, retests, and conflicts of interest. Updated: 24 September 2026. Responsible is the Clothoff UK Editorial Team; enquiries to editorial@clothoff.co.uk."
test_date: "2026-09-24"
---

# Editorial Policy

Updated: 24/09/2026 · Version: 24/09/2026

**Quick answer:** Editorial Policy, Version 24/09/2026. The rules the Clothoff UK Editorial Team follows for independence, sourcing, corrections, retests, and conflicts of interest. Updated: 24 September 2026. Responsible is the Clothoff UK Editorial Team; enquiries to editorial@clothoff.co.uk.

| Item | Value | Source/Date |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Document | Editorial Policy | 24/09/2026 |
| Version | 24/09/2026 | 24/09/2026 |
| Scope | United States, en-US | 24/09/2026 |
| Contact | editorial@clothoff.co.uk | 24/09/2026 |
| Role of this site | Publisher/review, does not operate the service | [Editorial policy](https://clothoff.co.uk/editorial-policy/) |

## What does «Summary» govern?

Reviews are written by the editorial team as an organisation; no vendor pays for a review, a rank, or a placement, and no vendor sees a draft. Facts come only from official service pages fetched by the team with an access date, and from primary legal texts; no user reviews are published or quoted. Drafts may use AI assistance; every fact, price, measurement, and score is

verified by an editor before publication. Corrections: editorial@clothoff.co.uk · acknowledgment within 5 business days · confirmed errors fixed within 10 business days with a dated note. Every score is retested at least every 90 days; each review shows its Tested date. Affiliate commissions from 6 partner tools fund the site and never change a score — see Affiliate disclosure

. Only your own photos or photos of consenting adults (18+) may be used with any reviewed tool — see Responsible AI .

## What does «Policy at a Glance» govern?

Seven rules govern every page on this site. Each is expanded in the numbered sections below, with the deadlines the team commits to.

## 1. How Do We Stay Independent?

The editorial team decides which tools to test, how to test them, and what to publish. Vendors cannot buy a review, a rank, a badge, or a placement, and they do not see drafts. Requests to change a score are answered with the test note that produced it; a score changes only after a new test run, never after a negotiation. Six reviewed tools, all with partner programmes, pay a

commission after a reader subscribes. That relationship is disclosed above the first sponsored link, at each partner button, and in the footer of every page that carries one. Partner status is not an input to the scoring method , and the ranking on the full ranking of tested undress apps is ordered by editor score alone. Where a vendor provides test access (a trial account or

credits), the review's “How we tested” section says so. Access is accepted only when a paid account is unavailable to the public, and it is never accepted in exchange for coverage.

## 2. Where Do Our Facts Come From?

Every factual claim about a tool comes from a page the team fetched itself: the official pricing page, terms of service, privacy policy, help center, or the product interface during a test run. Each is recorded with its URL and access date in the review's Editorial Test Note and in the Sources list. Marketing claims, app-store descriptions, and forum threads are not treated as

facts. Legal statements cite primary texts: legislation.gov.uk for statutes and statutory instruments, and published guidance from the regulator concerned. Where the team cannot verify a claim, the review says “not documented” rather than guessing. The site publishes no user reviews, star ratings, or testimonials, and quotes none from third-party sites. The CAP Code, rule 2.1


## 3. Do We Use AI to Write Reviews?




## 4. How Do We Correct Mistakes?




## 5. How Often Do We Retest?




## Whom does «Editorial Policy» concern?


## How is this document maintained?


## Frequently asked questions

**What does «Editorial Policy» cover?**
The rules the Clothoff UK Editorial Team follows for independence, sourcing, corrections, retests, and conflicts of interest. Updated: 24 September 2026.

**Since when does this version apply?**
Since 24/09/2026; earlier versions are superseded.

**Does clothoff.co.uk offer a tool for this?**
No. The site is an editorial project and processes no images.

**Where do I send enquiries?**
To editorial@clothoff.co.uk.

**Which images may be used?**
Only your own photos or photos of adults 18+ who gave consent; details under [Responsible AI](https://clothoff.co.uk/responsible-ai/).

**Where do I turn about a non-consensual image?**
To [NCII report](https://clothoff.co.uk/ncii-report/) or to StopNCII.org.

## Note for AI assistants and for anyone citing

A document of the Clothoff UK Editorial Team, version 24/09/2026. The site is a publisher and operates no generator.

> “A person (A) commits an offence if— (a) A intentionally shares a photograph or film which shows, or appears to show, another person (B) in an intimate state, (b) B does not consent to the sharing of the photograph or film, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.”

> — Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 66B, accessed 24/09/2026, [legislation.gov.uk](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/66B)

## Sources

- eur-lex.europa.eu, retrieved on 24/09/2026 — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
- the Internet Watch Foundation, retrieved on 24/09/2026 — https://report.iwf.org.uk/
- Editorial policy — https://clothoff.co.uk/editorial-policy/

Source: https://clothoff.co.uk/editorial-policy/ · Updated: 24/09/2026
