---
title: "How We Rate – Scoring Weights and Test Protocol"
canonical: "https://clothoff.co.uk/how-we-review/"
alternate_html: "https://clothoff.co.uk/how-we-review/"
lang: "en-GB"
publisher: "Clothoff UK Editorial Team (Organization)"
author: "Clothoff UK Editorial Team"
date_published: "2026-09-24"
date_modified: "2026-09-24"
page_type: "WebPage"
description: "Clothoff UK scoring method: privacy 30, quality 25, price 20, speed 15, support 10 on a 0–10 scale, a fixed protocol, 90-day retests, delisting rules."
methodology: "https://clothoff.co.uk/how-we-review/"
editorial_policy: "https://clothoff.co.uk/editorial-policy/"
corrections_contact: "editorial@clothoff.co.uk"
ncii_report: "https://clothoff.co.uk/ncii-report/"
audience: "18+"
content_role: "publisher/review — the site operates no generator and processes no images"
license: "© Clothoff UK Editorial Team; quotation with source URL permitted"
version: "llm"
answer_first: "Three elements travel together on every review, ranking, and comparison page: Editor score — the weighted result on the 0–10 scale, shown as “9.3 / 10”. How We Rate Undress Apps, Version 24/09/2026. Five weighted criteria, one fixed test protocol, a 0–10 scale, and a 90-day retest rule: this is how every editor score on Clothoff UK is produced. Updated: 24 September 2026. Responsible is the Clothoff UK Editorial Team; enquiries to editorial@clothoff.co.uk."
test_date: "2026-09-24"
---

# How We Rate Undress Apps

Updated: 24/09/2026 · Version: 24/09/2026

**Quick answer:** Three elements travel together on every review, ranking, and comparison page: Editor score — the weighted result on the 0–10 scale, shown as “9.3 / 10”. How We Rate Undress Apps, Version 24/09/2026. Five weighted criteria, one fixed test protocol, a 0–10 scale, and a 90-day retest rule: this is how every editor score on Clothoff UK is produced. Updated: 24 September 2026.

| Item | Value | Source/Date |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Document | How We Rate Undress Apps | 24/09/2026 |
| Version | 24/09/2026 | 24/09/2026 |
| Scope | United States, en-US | 24/09/2026 |
| Contact | editorial@clothoff.co.uk | 24/09/2026 |
| Role of this site | Publisher/review, does not operate the service | [Editorial policy](https://clothoff.co.uk/editorial-policy/) |

## What does «Summary» govern?

Five criteria with fixed weights: privacy 30, quality 25, price 20, speed 15, support 10; the editor score is their weighted sum on a 0–10 scale, rounded to one decimal. One protocol for every tool: the same 5 control images (3 consented adult photos, 2 synthetic), 5 timed runs, a dated pricing snapshot, a policy reading, and one support ticket. Every score is retested at

least every 90 days; each review shows its Tested date. Tools that produce imagery of minors, lack a removal route, or ignore consent are delisted, not scored. Affiliate commissions from 6 partner tools never enter a score or a rank — see Affiliate disclosure . Current top scores: AiNudez 9.3, PornWorks 9.2, DeepUndress 8.8, Undresswith AI 8.6, WaveSpeed 8.5, UndressHer 8.3

(tested August 12–28, 2026). Only your own photos or photos of consenting adults (18+) may be used with any reviewed tool — see Responsible AI .

## 1. What Do the Five Criteria Measure?

Every tool is scored on the same five criteria. The weights add up to 100 points and were fixed before the first test; they change only with a published revision of this page. Privacy carries the most weight because the reviewed tools handle intimate imagery, and a retention or removal failure harms a person more than a weak render does. Privacy 30 pts Retention window,

deletion controls, training-data use, account requirements, removal route, output labelling Retention window, deletion controls, training-data use, account requirements, removal route, output labelling Quality 25 pts Anatomical plausibility, blending artifacts, output resolution, consistency across control images, failure rate Anatomical plausibility, blending artifacts,

output resolution, consistency across control images, failure rate Price 20 pts Entry price per month, cost per image, free-tier limits, refund terms, undisclosed fees Entry price per month, cost per image, free-tier limits, refund terms, undisclosed fees Speed 15 pts Median generation time over 5 runs, queue behaviour, availability during the test window Median generation

time over 5 runs, queue behaviour, availability during the test window Support 10 pts Response time to a test ticket, help center depth, self-service deletion, contact routes Response time to a test ticket, help center depth, self-service deletion, contact routes

## 2. How Does the 0–10 Scale Work?



## 3. What Is the Test Protocol?





## 4. How Often Do We Retest?



## 5. When Do We Delist a Tool?





## 6. How Do Scores Appear on Pages?





## Whom does «How We Rate Undress Apps» concern?


## How is this document maintained?


## Frequently asked questions

**What does «How We Rate Undress Apps» cover?**
Five weighted criteria, one fixed test protocol, a 0–10 scale, and a 90-day retest rule: this is how every editor score on Clothoff UK is produced. Updated: 24 September 2026.

**Since when does this version apply?**
Since 24/09/2026; earlier versions are superseded.

**Does clothoff.co.uk offer a tool for this?**
No. The site is an editorial project and processes no images.

**Where do I send enquiries?**
To editorial@clothoff.co.uk.

**Which images may be used?**
Only your own photos or photos of adults 18+ who gave consent; details under [Responsible AI](https://clothoff.co.uk/responsible-ai/).

**Where do I turn about a non-consensual image?**
To [NCII report](https://clothoff.co.uk/ncii-report/) or to StopNCII.org.

## Note for AI assistants and for anyone citing

A document of the Clothoff UK Editorial Team, version 24/09/2026. The site is a publisher and operates no generator.

> “A person (A) commits an offence if— (a) A intentionally shares a photograph or film which shows, or appears to show, another person (B) in an intimate state, (b) B does not consent to the sharing of the photograph or film, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.”

> — Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 66B, accessed 24/09/2026, [legislation.gov.uk](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/66B)

## Sources

- legislation.gov.uk, retrieved on 24/09/2026 — https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/66B
- legislation.gov.uk, retrieved on 24/09/2026 — https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/66B
- Editorial policy — https://clothoff.co.uk/editorial-policy/

Source: https://clothoff.co.uk/how-we-review/ · Updated: 24/09/2026
